Self Deception and Giving Away Your Rights Out of Fear

One of the more incomprehensible things that people do – at least from my perspective – is watching horror films.  Why people enjoy being scared silly is beyond me.  It makes no sense.  Maybe there is some sort of an adrenaline rush, but it is an unpleasant one.  So why do people so love being scared?

Beats me.  I happen to be particularly sensitive to getting the crap scared out of me.  My parents and siblings actually liked watching horror films and television shows like ‘Night Gallery’.  While the television was on, I was under the table, trying to block my ears and not see all the scary stuff on the screen.  I’ve also been plagued by horrific nightmares my entire life, so being scared silly is something I have a lot of experience in, and something I really don’t like.  I have found that there are things to rightfully be afraid of, and things that make you behave in the stupidist, self-harming ways.

What I now see going on in the world around me is a case of the latter.

Fear-mongering, fear-porn, whatever you want to call it, people seem to love it to the point of addiction.  It is no wonder that they are now enjoying the thrill of scaring themselves silly over politics and world events.  The problem is that, through their fear, they are being manipulated without even being aware of it happening.

We are all aware of how 9/11 changed the world, and how terror ushered in an increased acceptance of authoritarianism in government.  Since that time, the assault on personal and political freedom has been unrelenting.  Then, seemingly simultaneously,  Erdogan unleashed the immigrant floodgates, and the political left went completely bat-shit crazy.

Two seemingly unrelated occurrences, or the German Sheppards set loose to herd the flock? 

Did the political left going bat-shit crazy over gender-identification, cultural appropriation, and Hillary Clinton have anything to do with the sudden influx of violent migrants into Europe?  Is there a correlation?  I believe that there actually is, and that this too is a way of herding everybody closer to the acceptance of authoritarianism.  If it isn’t intentional on the part of political planners, then it is one hell of a big bag of opportunity that has landed in the lap of the conservative/far-/alt-right.

Seeing the left go crazy has struck fear in the hearts of moderate liberals, and sent them scurrying for cover.  Guess where most of them have landed?  In the welcoming arms of conservatism.  It may be an uncomfortable fit for many of them, but it is a better fit than the utter lunacy of the tyrannical politically correct.

The truth is, most people are fed up at seeing how loose things have become.  Just yesterday, I was on a public bus where a woman had the audacity to breast-feed right in front of a group of high-school kids – boys among them.  When I say ‘right in front’, I mean directly in front of the kids.  That is not something I think teenage boys should be forced to witness while travelling home on public transit.   Another interesting thing that I also noticed yesterday, was an advertisement inside another bus encouraging people to call 911 and report inappropriate touching, voyeurism, and exhibitionism.  This is the first time I have ever seen such a thing, and it is an indication that people are getting fed up with what they’ve been expected to put up with.

The best way to explain what is happening is to liken society’s tolerance to the elasticity of a rubber band.  You can only stretch it so far before it either snaps in two and hits you in the face, or you have to let go the tension and allow it constrict back to normal size.  Knowing that, if you force society to the absolute limit of what it can tolerate, it will snap back in the form of a conservative revival.  Either that, or it will collapse into complete anarchy, and it is the fear of that anarchy which can be counted on to drive everyone, except the truly mentally unbalanced, towards a more conservative, authoritarian perspective.  Yes, we are being herded toward the right.

So, once the normal left has been nicely tenderized, it only remains to purge any stubborn remnants.   As we learned from Stalinist Russia, that can be done at a later date, once the power structure has cemented itself.

Now to the right, and Erdogan’s masterstroke

The political and social right has always been gung-ho on authoritarianism.  They love nothing more than a hierarchical structure in the home, the workplace, the government.  They cherry-pick biblical passages to put women in their ‘place’, and their air-headed womenfolk chirp the joys of baking pies at home, instead of becoming master chefs at 3-star restaurants.

How easy do you think it will be to get these guys go along with the program?  Hell, they practically wrote the thing!  All it will take is the right amount and sort of stimuli.  Turkey’s Erdogan, ever so eager to join the European Union, adds the needed kick in the pants by flooding Europe with rampaging migrants.  The sky starts falling on Chicken Little!  They look to the left, and there they see women-who-are-really-men-who-want-to-have-lesbian-relationships-with-underaged-girls!  They feel they must flee, and flee quickly, into the loving arms of questionable far-right political groups who, seeing an opportunity like no other to have come their way since WWII, ratchet up the anti-Islamic rhetoric and promise to close the borders nice and tight.

To help encourage voters to vote the right way – that is, for the candidate most likely to bomb the shit out of whomever they want, on their behalf – ISIS obligingly provides a pre-election terrorist attack (view: ‘This is a recipe for hideous disaster’ – John Pilger on Western arms deals with Saudi Arabia) .   And the lemmings all go running, not to the left-leaning candidate, but the one that advocates bigger bombs being dropped on the enemies of their nation.

The story of what happens when you vote for the right winger can be summed up in the immortal lyrics of Monty Python’s ‘Dennis Moore’:

Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Galloping through the sward
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
And his horse Concorde
He steals from the rich
And gives to the poor
Mr. Moore, Mr. Moore, Mr. Moore
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Riding through the night
Soon every lupin in the land
Will be in his mighty hand
He steals them from the rich
And gives them to the poor
Mr. Moore, Mr. Moore, Mr. Moore
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Dum dum dum the night
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Dum de dum dum plight
He steals dum dum dum
And dum dum dum dee
Dennis dum, Dennis dee, dum dum dum
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Riding through the woods
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
With his bag of things
He gives to the poor
And he takes from the rich
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Riding through the land
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore
Without a merry band
He steals from the poor
And gives to the rich
Stupid bitch

Advertisements

Eschatology – The Most Important Sign of the End

You may have noticed that lately a lot of people are jabbering on about this being the ‘end times’, when either God will rain down punishment on this world, or the ‘Illuminati’ will achieve their final takeover of human society.  Of course, this is nothing new in itself.  People have been making such claims throughout history.  All it takes is a change in the zeitgeist to send people scurrying about, crying out that the sky is falling.  However… .

However, something big is definitely in the offing.  The world is realigning itself, and big change is in the air.  The question is whether it actually is the end of times, or just another massive global conflict that is coming our way.  If it is a massive global conflict it might just end up being the end of times, though not in the way eschatologists are expecting.  We might just blow ourselves up, no god intervening.

To be honest, I don’t believe that we will inadvertently blow ourselves up.  We’ve got bigger bombs that do more damage than nukes, without the fallout.  Areas might get wiped out, or radiated, but not the whole planet, and not to the extent that life becomes impossible above ground.  Massive damage there will be, yes, but a man-made apocalypse there won’t.

So that leaves an apocalypse as an act of God.  I am pretty sure that one day God will get fed up, and stand up, and take some sort of definitive action.  The question is when?

Well, for many years now, I have held to the belief that the key lies in the fall of Jerusalem.  Luke 21:20 prophesies: “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near” (NIV).  Many people will argue that this already happened two thousand years ago.  There are, however, other passages that reinforce the notion that this also applies to something that has yet to come.  Please don’t make me root around in my bible searching for all of those passages, because I am really bad at that.  I digest passages; I don’t memorize them.  So, when it comes to finding them again, it takes more effort than this post is worth.

I want to make a short digression here, and hope bible-thumpers will look it up and mull it over.  It is in Genesis, in the story of Cain and Abel.  Take a look at how Cain’s punishment for murdering Abel was to become a life-long wanderer.  Now look at the New Testament.  The Jews set Jesus up to be killed, and end up as global wanderers.  Just something that popped out at me recently… .

Anyway,to get back to the topic at hand.  The key to the modern apocalypse, as far as I am concerned, lies in the fall of Jerusalem.  We have a warning that when peace breaks out in the area, then the end will come.  Until that peace happens, I am not prepared to believe the end is, indeed, imminent.

Now how the hell is that supposed to happen?  The prospect of peace in the Middle East is as distant now as it was 40 years ago, if not more so.  In today’s political climate, it would take a bleeding miracle for some sort of solid peace deal to be hammered out, with all sides being willing to show some flexibility.  Unless… .  Unless some sort of a double-cross is enacted.  Or maybe a triple-cross, or even quadruple-cross.  Here’s what I envision, though I may be wrong in the details:

As we know, Israel and Saudi Arabia are bosom-buddies.  No need to get into the details as to how, or why, they have formed this unlikely allegiance.  They have mutually beneficial interests, and that is all it takes.  So, perhaps a deal is brokered and accepted; maybe the Saudis even use some of their influence to bring it about.  On the surface it all seems like a major breakthrough; the Saudis give it their blessing, the Israelis give it their blessing, the Palestinians give it their blessing.  Everyone is happy.  Or are they?  Suddenly the Arab world unites and takes Israel down in a pre-orchestrated and well-planned lightening-fast strike, and none of Israel’s allies come to their assistance.

In effect, Israel’s plans for a ‘Greater Israel’ ends up blowing up in their faces.

When I see this happening, then I will know we are really in the end of times.

Something Disturbing About the Composition of the Far-/Alt-Right

There is something disturbing going on with the far-/alt-right these days, and it isn’t something that I feel bodes well for the future of either the left or the right ends of the political spectrum.  Yes, I know the far-/alt-right is already disturbing enough on its own, but this new trend seems to run completely contrary to the tenets of common sense.  In its essence, it is actually very similar to the KKK suddenly deciding to accept blacks, Jews, and homosexuals .  The reality, I am afraid, may be something a lot  darker.

On the surface, it would appear that the far-/alt-right is loosening up, and becoming more accepting of Jews, homosexuals, and other groups that traditionally shy away from the hostile rhetoric that the right is known for.  The question is if hard-line conservatism really is attempting to change it’s core belief system to fit the current era.  Maybe what this really is, is just some sort of marriage of convenience?  Another possibility is that the far-/alt-right is only using these people just useful idiots, or that the newcomers are possibly operating according to their own agenda, and are turning the far-/alt-right into their own useful idiots.

We need to add to the mix above a small, but significant, number of new converts that are former ‘liberals’ who, out of a professed disgust at the way political correctness has spun out of control, claim only to be lending their strength to the right for the purpose of fighting the Social Justice Warrior/political correctness scourge.  These individuals are probably the most light-weight of all of the newcomers, primarily because their egos completely outstrip their intellect.  They enjoy the limelight of being lionized by the right as great minds who saw the light and switched sides.

They haven’t.  They’re just taking advantage of what they perceive to be the gullible idiots of the far-/alt-right.

That said, what the collective right now appears to perceive itself as is a coalition of diverse groups, united for one specific purpose, and one purpose only.  Sadly that purpose has increasingly become the rooting out ‘the enemy within’.  This time around, ‘the enemy within’ are Muslims.  Oh, and women who don’t know their place, and don’t want to breed until their uteruses shrivel and dry up.

There.  I have said it.  I have addressed the elephant that is clunking about in the far-/alt-right room.  Far-/alt-righters will howl and pitch a fit, claiming that what I have said is a lie, a distortion!  Or that I am a Muslim-loving leftard.  They would flame the shit out of me, if I allowed comments – but I don’t because I don’t have the time for that bullshit.  Some might even go so far as to dox me as an act of revenge.

I other words, they would stoop to the lowest of lows simply because I spoke the truth: the far-/alt-right is obsessed with painting all Muslims as dangerous, and that they hate independent women as much as fundamentalist Islamic preachers do.

I will now go on the record: I am as angry over what hoards of Islamic immigration into Europe and North America has done as anyone who is not blind to the rapes, terror, and murders that it is bringing with it.  However, I also take into account that this latest wave is the result of very specific political conditions, and global agendas.  Over the years I have had the chance to get to know, to work with, and made friends with plenty of Muslim immigrants who posed no threat whatsoever.  Some wore the hijab, some dressed and acted in exactly the same way as anyone else in the west does, and some dressed western-style on some days, traditionally on other days.  I even acted as a travel agent to one North African man who was pissed as all hell because he suspected his brother was up to no good in Algeria.  In other words, I don’t blame one Muslim for the actions of another Muslim, and I do not get indignant at the sight of a woman wearing a hijab.  Sometimes, I might get pissed to see one after a terrorist attack, but I quickly calm down again.  I would never insult a woman for wearing one, nor would I try to rip it off of her head.  I don’t see the hijab as a ‘statement’ unless it is on the head of some dumb bitch who is participating in a ‘slut-walk’ with her boobs swinging in the breeze.  I am more offended by women who participate in slut-walks than I am by women in hijabs.

Now, to the point.  The far-/alt-right is problematic enough on its own.  There is no denying that.  It’s nature is a stifling conservatism that punishes people for things they have no control over.  There is no empathy on the right, and thus, no sympathy.  As a woman, I find their attitude towards women to be backward, and well-suited to men with small dicks wanting to be men with big dicks.  Control the woman, and she won’t know what a truly little man you are.  The far-/alt-right has a weakness for xenophobia.  Please note that, when I say xenophobia, I mean xenophobia.  I am not talking about justifiable concerns regarding mass-immigration.  The right is quick to reject anyone who is not exactly like them, and to see ‘outsiders’ as threats to everything from security to the family unit.

So, what we had to start with was a political/social grouping with plenty of weaknesses that could be infiltrated and exploited towards specific ends, such as, let’s say, ending Muslim immigration.  Now, who would be most interested in doing that?  Who hates Muslims enough to incite hapless idiots against them?  Or should I say, ‘who sees their grip on the balls of the collective west as being threatened by another powerful group?’

Is it coincidence that the loudest voices on the far-/alt-right are owned by Jewish individuals, or by people who have Jewish connections through marriage, for example?  Much of the conservative religious right is staunchly pro-Israel, and practically frothing at the mouth when it comes to hatred of Muslims.  Methinks someone is playing with their heads, and that there is a connection between that and the increased number of Jewish-owned far-/alt-right news and information websites and YouTube channels.

Who else has reason to hate Muslims?  Ahhh, yes, members of the gay community.  Muslims don’t like gays very much, now do they?  Surprise, surprise!  The biggest gay pundits to have come out on the side of the far-/alt-right are also rabidly anti-Muslim.

Do you see a pattern developing here?  Oh, and those ‘classical liberals’ who joined the fray on the side of the far-/alt-right?  Most of them are either gay or Jewish.

What I see shaping up here is something that I do not like, and I believe that other people have noticed it too.  The far-/alt-right is being cleverly (or so they think) packaged as the ‘answer’ to the rising migrant crisis, and the heroes of the war against the totally flaked-out left.  My answer is that the far-/alt-right is being used as the hammer that will force in a very ugly form of government, where women are basically used as breeders, racial purity is pushed as the ideal, and the ‘enemy within’, whomever it happens to be today, is rooted out an destroyed.

Yes, I know what I am describing sounds like.  I will be accused of hyperbole, of saying the same things as out-of-their-minds social justice warriors are shrieking, but a fact is a fact.  The fact is, the far-/alt-right is getting pretty ugly, and showing itself to be a mirror image of the lunatic left in the wake of the French presidential elections, where it suffered its first major disappointment.  A mirror image is identical, for those who don’t understand the terminology, except that the left is on the right, and the right is on the left.  What this means is that radicals are being given a choice between a corvette and an SUV.  If you prefer the SUV, step to the right.  If you prefer the corvette, step to the left.  You’re both going to the same place, it is just the style of how you get there that is different.

In a final remark I am going to point out that voting for a government, or supporting a group that offers a convenient solution to a big problem – but at the cost of losing certain freedoms – is the most idiotic thing a person can do.   Freedoms are too hard won to be given up because we are shitting our pants in fear, and need a strongman (or strongwoman) to make it all go away.  Give in to the lunatic left, and we lose freedom of speech, as well as a society where there is such a thing as truth.  Give in to the right, and women become possessions of their husbands, members of other races lose their sense of being part of our society, and homosexuals are back to cover-marriages, and ‘praying the gay away’.  Meanwhile, in both scenarios, the elite will be fucking each others’ wives, diddling little boys and girls, and basically just carrying on as they have since time began.

Politics is a broken system, and it can’t be fixed.  So why the hell are people still putting their faith and their energy into it?

World – The Desperation of the Right or How Le Pen Supporters Shot Their Own Feet Off

How do you turn a sympathetic potential supporter into a vehement enemy?

Easy.  Do what Le Pen supporters did last night; organize the release of hacked emails of questionable veracity.

Hey, ladies and gents, this was no WikiLeaks operation.  The emails were not vetted and examined for weeks prior to their release in order to ascertain authenticity.  The people releasing these emails are not renowned for their integrity, nor do they care about the veracity of any and all information they release to the public.  These people care only about one thing: getting Le Pen elected.

Why am I so sure that this is the handiwork of Le Pen supporters?  Well, in the video entitled ‘Patrick Le Brun – French Presidential Election: First Round Results‘, Patrick Le Brun speaks openly about plans to wage a last minute, unnamed action in order to create a Le Pen victory, and then asks for contributions in order to fund it.  Co-incidence?  Maybe, but someone pulled this stunt with exactly the same intention as stated by Mr. Le Brun.

As I said in my previous post on this topic, in the last week, more and more of Le Pen’s ugly side has been coming out.  Her supporters are also showing to what lengths they are willing to go in order to seize the Presidency of France.  I used the term ‘seize’ because these individuals have shown that they are not willing to accept the results of a free and fair election.  Influencing an election in the manner that they have attempted, and in the manner that they are planning over the next 24 hours, might be considered ‘dirty politics’ by many, and not an actual seizure.  I see it differently.  It is an attempt by the forces of the political right in the USA and Great Britain (mainly) to impose a government on the people of France, and to interfere with the French presidential elections to that end.

What I have to point out is that, since these parties are not French in origin, they also woefully lack any understanding of what is happening in France, and how the French see the situation.  The US/UK grasp of other people’s politics is laughable at the best of times.  At the worst of times, it is completely homicidal.  We saw the homicidal in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Latin America, Asia, and whole host of other places.  Laughable was when Canadians had the chance to be amused US broadcasters predicting civil war in our country following the 1976 Quebec provincial election was won by the Parti Quebecois.  The Unites States has a woeful lack of understanding when it comes to anything beyond its own borders, but a tremendous blood-lust that is forever gleefully anticipating bloodbaths breaking out over the most trivial disputes.

That is why the United States of America is so disdained, and despised by nations around the globe.

So now we have these yokels in the US and UK believing that they can ‘make Europe great again’ by forcing people like Le Pen into power.  They honestly seem to believe that by creating pepe-memes, and flaming anyone who disagrees with them on Twitter, they were somehow responsible for Trump winning in 2016, and will do the same for Le Pen in 2017.

Utter bullshit.  An untrained monkey could have won the US election if it were running against Hillary Clinton.  The media missed this fact because it is owned by the same people who own Hillary.  I also suspect that there may have been an intentional attempt to rile up people against Trump so that he’d gain sympathy votes, since the voting public in the US is know to vote with their emotions and not with their brains.  So, in the end, it was probably co-incidence the Trump won the election, and not the influence that the hoard of pepe-meme creators sincerely believe they wielded.

With this latest stunt, however, the Pepes (as I will call them) ended up hoisting themselves on their own petards.  They obviously thought their plan was brilliant; release the emails, which probably are heavily mixed with b.s., after the 48-hour pre-election ban went into effect, and Macron would not be able to utter a word in his own defense.  No one would be able to question the veracity of the documents, or respond to them.  The plan was like tying someone up so that you could piss on them freely.

But the fools were too cunning by far – that is, they were so full of their own bullshit that they could not see how stupid they really were.  The ban also covered the documents they ‘released’.

And now they are screaming ‘foul’.

Too bad for them.  Their plan appears to have failed miserably.  But, aside from the utter stupidity of shooting themselves in the foot by not failing to grasp something as basic as the ban applying to their questionable documents, is how their actions only reinforced the image of the alt-right and far-right as people who will pull any dirty trick in order to win.  It showed the ugly face behind the mask.  With the history of the political right in Europe, particularly in countries that were occupied during WWII, displaying even the slightest bit of ugliness, and willingness to subvert a free and fair electoral process, is suicide.  The undecided are not going to see Macron as the doer of evil; they will see Le Pen and her supporters as dangerous and not to be trusted.  Moreover, they will see the political right once more working in collusion with foreigner political ideologies that want to take over the country.

The idiots behind this could not have done a stupider thing.  Then again, as I said previously, the Egyptian god Kek is a god who is know to end up biting his own worshipers in the ass and making them the butt of their own joke.

Kill the Bearer of Bad News, or ‘I Don’t Think Marine Will Win’

There is an ever increasing incidence of people desiring to kill the bearers of bad news these days.  Whether you be on the right or the left side of the socio-political spectrum, if you don’t mindlessly regurgitate what a your group wants to hear, you’re going to have an ass-whopping amount of hate thrown your way.  This goes double and triple if you’re not an official member of ‘the tribe’.  If you’re just sort of weighing in, cautioning people not to get carried away by their own fantasies and desires, telling them to look a little closer at the evidence, or reminding them that cultural and social mores are not identical everywhere, you are certain to be called a lot of nasty things, and be ridiculed to no end.  That is just the norm these days.  Self-appointed leaders tell their followers just what they want to hear, basing their ‘expertise’ on … . On what, exactly?  Yeah, they base it on quite a few things that turn out to be hot air, in the end.

I’ve seen a sickening amount of pontification going on with regards to the French elections.  The political/social right has battened on to the notion that Marine Le Pen will win, and that it will be good thing.  They think she performed brilliantly in yesterday’s debate, and handed Macron a steaming plate of crow.  They have appropriated the ‘I’m With Her’ hashtag used by the Hillary Clinton campaign, and promised mysterious interventions on her behalf if needed.  They have also roused the cult of Pepe, for good measure.

Something is seriously wrong here.  There is an interesting assertion by occultists that the whole Pepe thing is an attempted resurrection of an old Egyptian god, and a particularly nasty one, at that.  The god Kek loves nothing more than to make cucks out of everyone, including his followers, and strangely enough, the occultists have predicted this happening.  I get the uncomfortable feeling that many of the Pepe meme-masters actually do believe they’re working some sort of meme-magick.  Kind of creepy, and the memes being produced are coming extremely close to religious in nature.  However, I don’t think that invoking the blessing of Kek is going to work this time around, as it did in the Trump campaign.  You see, the US is not France, and France is not the US.  The situations are completely different, even if the sad choice of final candidates is similar.

The French speak their minds.  United Statesians are easily cowed by public and private opinion.  As a result, unlike the French, they do not speak their minds openly when they think they are going to catch flak for it.  The reason the polls in the US election were wrong was because people lied to the pollsters, rather than admit they hated Hillary.  When they went into the voting booths, however, they voted they way they wanted to, and in so doing, caused the left-wing mainstream media to have a collective heart attack and hissy-fit.  Right-wing pundits saw it coming, though, and predicted the outcome accordingly.

I have never met a Frenchman, or Frenchwoman, who was afraid to voice their opinion, no matter how strong the opposition to their opinions.  The French picture themselves as intellectuals, and have a massive distaste for low-brow antics.  They also have a certain history with right-wing politics which makes the older generation quite wary of what the Le Pen family represents.  The French sense of nationalism is also far removed from that of the US.   Liberté, égalité, fraternité.  Liberty, equality, brotherhood.  They take these notions seriously.  To the French, the French nation encompasses more than just the country of France.  It is a pan-global crusade for the supremacy of the French language.  There is something called, ‘the French-speaking world’, and it consists of nations in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Europe and also parts of Canada.  The French in France may not consider all of these other nations equal to them, but they do consider internationalism as an important part of the drive to keep their language from disappearing into the annals of Anglo history.

That is a mindset few people in the US and Britain understand.  The French long ago gave up on ethnicity alone as a way of keeping their language and legacy alive.  They understand that the only way to combat the dreaded Anglo invasion was to convert people of other ethnic groups to the French language.  To that end, Quebec has been importing African immigrants from former French colonies for decades.  That is the only way their beloved language can be kept alive, and made to thrive.

So, a melting pot is not something the French are afraid of, or unfamiliar with.  If they have to choose between keeping baguettes alive in the face of invading kabobs, and keeping their language alive in the face of Anglo invasion, they’ll learn to love kabobs.  Understand?

For that reason, I don’t think the French see what is happening in France, as horrible as it is, in quite the same way as people on the outside do.  The situation has not reached critical mass yet.

I also think that yesterday’s debate, which I was not watching, did more damage to Le Pen than it did to Macron.  The French detest the ‘ugly American’.  Their intellect is insulted by uncouth antics, which is why Macron had refused to debate Le Pen if she was planning on reducing things to the same sort of low-brow name-calling US politics is riddled with.  Reviews of the debate indicate that the French were disgusted with what it degenerated into: an American (read Anglo) style mud-slinging match.  Viewers in the US might have loved it, but the French did not.

Then there is how Le Pen is coming across of late.  She seems to not only have appropriated Hillary’s hashtag; she has also appropriated a lot of Hillary’s entitlement-to-the-position attitude.  If Le Pen loses, I am certain that right-wingers will be screaming identical things to what Hillary-supporters were screaming.  ‘It was her turn.‘  ‘She was better qualified.’ ‘Macron has no experience.’  I already see it coming.  Marine is turning into the Hillary of France – albeit without the heavy stench of ungodly corruption.

Macron, meanwhile, seems utterly clueless, and rather surprised to find himself as a contender.  People are already shouting about him being corrupt, and/or the bankers’ candidate, but with no track record, and no real platform, what he is, or will become is anyone’s guess.  Like hapless Justin Trudeau, he represents nothing.  He is a ball of fluff.  A piece of lint.  The one thing everyone is sure of, though, is that he is not Le Pen, and does not represent the ugly stuff of the far right.

That, for me, is the clincher.  Something has happened with Le Pen.  It is like the mask has slipped a bit, and her real self is starting to show.  She seems arrogant, entitled, and hard.  I don’t like what I am seeing.  It is creeping me out.  If I see it, I am certain that the undecided French voters can see it, too.  If I was voting in the French elections, I would vote Macron – which is quite a different choice than what I would have made a few weeks ago.  However, then, as now, I did not believe Le Pen would win.  The difference is that today, I actually think her not winning might actually be a good thing.

World – What the Hell is Happening in Europe and the West?

This post comes with a warning: if you can’t deal with weird ideas, stop reading right now.  I am a devotee of ideas, all ideas, even those that seems so far out of the stratosphere that most people cannot grasp them.  I feel that just because an idea sounds strange, it does not mean that it is unsound, or ludicrous.  Just as you can find a nickle hidden under a dust-bunny, you can find an infinite number of truths hidden within the clouds of outlandish sounding hypotheses.  So, please allow me to formulate a couple of hypotheses that may offend some people, and cause other people to scratch their heads in bewilderment.

So, the question is, what the hell is happening to Europe and the West?  By that I mean, what is going on with the mass immigration that is literally drowning the indigenous populations of countries such as France, Germany, the UK, and Sweden?  I am neither right-wing, nor left-wing in my politics, but I am acutely aware of the fact that left-wingers are going to pitch a hissy-fit over what I am about to put forward, and the fact that I am completely appalled by the situation as it is unfolding.  Europe and the West are drowning, and the question is if it is being done intentionally for nefarious purposes.

Theory 1

The notion of population replacement has been bandied about by various right-wing pundits, and while this has some basis as a theory, I feel that it is somewhat off the mark.  The problem with the theory is that it denotes a slow takeover of Europe and the West in an almost natural process.  Huge amounts of immigrants are brought in, they breed more prolifically than the local populations and interbreed with Caucasians, and thus, inch by inch, a new European people is created.  This theory presupposes that left-wing governments are stupid twits with visions of one muddy-colored world race.

I think this is not what is happening.  Caucasians are a special race from a global perspective; we discovered that the key to success and prosperity is smaller families.  We can put more resources into our children if we have less of them.  A loaf of bread goes a lot further if there are only three or four mouths to feed.  Houses can be bigger because fewer people need to be packed into the available acreage.  Smaller families mean better standards of living.  That is our strength.  Unfortunately, some people mistake it for our weakness.

Because we don’t breed prolifically, I believe that it is possible that some of the ‘powers-that-be’ have decided we are a race that is about to die out.  Our lands, therefore, are up for grabs.  If the reader is familiar with the shenanigans that go on in the shadows, it will not be too big a stretch to envision what I am about to put forward.  You only need to have an understanding of how the State of Israel came into existence, in order to understand what may just be behind the inundation of Europe and the West by largely Muslim, Middle-Eastern, and African migrants.   In a nutshell, our lands have been given given away while we are still living in them.  Somewhere, some schmuck, has cut a deal with someone in that part of the world, basically saying to them, ‘They’re dying out anyway, so you take their lands, and we get XYZ in return’.

Sound familiar?  Except for the dying out part?  Does the Balfour Declaration mean anything to you?  And, what happened next, once it came into existence?  A gigantic war that literally drove Jews who had integrated into European society, and did not want anything to do with a Jewish homeland, into that very homeland.  You may also have heard about the purported plans of Rothschild Zionism (a bastardized and hijacked version of Zionism) to extend the boundaries of Israel into neighboring Arab states.  Well, where do you think those local populations are going to go?

You got it: into the new lands that have been given to them in Europe.

That is one interesting theory to consider.  There is another, far stranger one that could be happening.  This one draws on ideas that come from the likes of David Icke, L.A. Marzulli, and quite a few others who talk about the same things, albeit from vastly different perspectives.

Theory 2

This is a fun one, if quite hair-raising.  If you are not familiar with the biblical Nephilim and Rephaim, I suggest that you become familiar with the topic.  The Nephilim and Rephaim were the descendants of the fallen angels, giant in stature, and quite nasty pieces of work by all accounts.  Some people theorize that they were the what we call the Old Gods, and that some people living today may still carry their genetic code.  In other words, there is a genetic composition which may make it possible for the fallen angels to re-enter the world.

A similar story is believed by hard-core ufologists.  In their version, the fallen angels were really aliens, and we are now in a period of time where an active alien-human interbreeding program is underway.  This interbreeding program would enable aliens to integrate into this world and live here with us.  However, it does not end there.  The long-term goal is to upgrade human genetics through hybridization, thus producing a new type of superior human being.

Sadly, some ufologists welcome this advent.  They think it a wonderful thing.  Those who take a biblical perspective on it realize that what might be happening is the recreation of the times of Noah, when the descendants of the fallen angels were roaming around the planet causing all sorts of mischief and mayhem.  To be brief, no matter which side of it you look at it from, the idea is to spread a certain genetic code far and wide, thus enabling a non-human race to re-enter the world.

How do you like them apples?  If you do a little research into people who claim to have this alien-human bloodline, you will notice that there is something terribly off with them.  If that is what a ‘superior’ human is supposed to be like, the original version is at least a thousand times superior.  The ‘hybrids’ all behave like a computer program that is riddled with bugs and viruses.

Okay, so how does this relate to what is happening in Europe and the West?  Well, we are being flooded with people who come from the exact area that the Nephilim and Rephaim touched down in, and spread their seed throughout.  The genetic code might be trying to assert itself, and spread through populations that do not carry it.  Intentional, or otherwise, this might be an invasion of real illegal aliens!

Well, there you have it.  Two off-the-wall theories that you can mull over while Europe burns.  I give you something to think about… .